Version 7, changed by admin. 08/23/2007. Show version history
A stand is a contiguous, distinguishable group of trees with a relatively uniform age distribution, composition, structure, and soil condition (Helms 1998). The change in a stand’s appearance with time has been long noticed, and historically described as “succession.” In the past, this succession assumed, as the name implies, that one species succeeded another as each species modified the site to conditions better adapted to the following species. Studies of the past few decades have revealed that a different set of processes causes this change in appearance with time. To avoid confusion with the older concept of succession, the term “stand development” is commonly used to describe the changes in a stand over time following the newer understanding of processes.
It is now recognized that the dominant processes occurring in a forest are as follows:
A stand develops through individual trees growing, competing, and dying at different rates—punctuated by disturbances of different types and magnitudes. A general pathway, or trajectory, has been described that is common among many forest stands in the world following a disturbance after which no other disturbance occurs for a very long time. The trajectory will first be described following a “stand-replacing” disturbance; i.e., a disturbance that eliminates all previous trees in the stand. The pathway creates different “stages” in which different processes predominate. The stages have been described in several ways, usually as variations of the following (Oliver 1981):
When a disturbance does not remove all trees, the residual trees compete for growing space with the newly regenerating trees and create a similar stand development pattern with certain differences: With increasing numbers of residual trees, the post-disturbance cohort is more shaded. With increasing shade, all trees grow increasingly slowly; but trees of less shade tolerant trees suffer most and may die, causing the understory trees to consist of increasingly shade tolerant species.
The stages that emerge from stand development pathways form very characteristic distributions of sizes, numbers, and species of trees, shrubs, herbs, and snags and logs. These distinct distributions are known as “structures” (Helms 1998). These structures are important because the different structures provide habitats for different species; different susceptibilities to winds, fires, insects, and other disturbances; different volumes and qualities of timber; and differences in other values.
Different authors have identified various structures (Carey et al., 1999); however, they generally have a common origin in the structures described above. Unfortunately, some structures described below have common names with the stages described above, leading to confusion between a process and an appearance. Common structures and their associated processes are:
Some structural classifications distinguish between the savanna or old growth structures with and without large diameter trees; and other structural classifications divide the old growth structure into several structures.
A forested landscape commonly contains a variety of structures as each stand develops from one structure to another through a combination of growth and disturbances (Oliver et al. 1998). For example, a stand may follow a trajectory, or pathway of being in the savanna structure, but growing to the old growth structure with the exclusion of fire. Then, if a stand-replacing disturbance impacted it, the open and then dense structure would develop, followed by the understory structure barring a disturbance. A disturbance in the dense structure could change the stand to the open, savanna, or understory structure; and a disturbance in the understory or complex structure could create an open or savanna structure.
Some topographic positions on the landscape more commonly have certain disturbance types and frequencies—and consequently more commonly follow some pathways. For example, an upper slope exposed to heat or wind could commonly be subject to wind, fire, or other stand-replacing disturbances and thus commonly have a pathway that cycles between the open and dense structure. Protected areas could be subjected to relative infrequent disturbances and thus have pathways that cycled the stand largely within the complex structure. Consequently, some stand development pathways, and some structures, are found more commonly in some topographic positions than in others (Camp et al. 1997).
References
Carey, A.B., B.R. Lippke, and J. Sessions. 1999. Intentional ecosystem management: managing forests for biodiversity. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 9, 83.
Camp, A., C. Oliver, P. Hessburg, and R. Everett. 1997. Predicting late-successional fire refugia pre-dating European settlement in the Wenatchee Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management 95: 63-77.
Franklin, J.F. 1984. Characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters National Convention. 10-16.
Helms, J.A., Ed. 1998. The dictionary of forestry, Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD.
Oliver, C.D. 1981. Forest development in North America following major disturbances. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management 3. (1980-81) 153-168.
Oliver, C.D., and B.C. Larson. 1996. Forest Stand Dynamics. Update Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 521 pp.
Oliver, C.D., A.Camp, and A.Osawa. 1998. Forest dynamics and resulting animal and plant population changes at the stand and landscape levels. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 6(3/4) 1998: 281-312.
Oliver, C.D., and K. L. O’Hara. 2004. Effects of restoration at the stand level. Chapter 3 In (J.A. Stanturf and P. Marsden, editors) Restoration of Boreal and Temperate Forests. CRC Press, New York. 31 – 59.
Parker, G.R. 1989. Old-growth forests of the central hardwood region. Natural Area Journal 9. 5-11.
Posted: April 2007
Updated: 23 August 2007